
Peer Review Process
|
Tunjuk Ajar: Journal of Education and Culture implements a double-blind peer review process, where the identities of both authors and reviewers are kept confidential to ensure objectivity in manuscript evaluation. The review process follows these steps: |
|
Initial Screening by the Editor:
|
|
Reviewer Assignment:
|
|
Review Process:
|
|
Final Decision:
|
|
Publication:
|
|
Peer Review Policy
|
|
With a rigorous peer review process, Tunjuk Ajar: Journal of Education and Culture is committed to maintaining the quality and integrity of academic publications. |
Publication Process
| No | Stage | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Submit | Author submits the manuscript |
| 2 | Initial check (Section Editor) | Check format suitability, topic, plagiarism |
| 3 | Initial decision | Reject / Proceed to review |
| 4 | Round 1 review (Send to reviewers) | Minimum 2 reviewers |
| 5 | Round 1 reviewer comments | Reviewer 1 & Reviewer 2 |
| 6 | Round 1 editor decision | Reject / Major Rev / Minor Rev / Accept |
| 7 | Author revision round 1 | Author uploads revision |
| 8 | Round 2 review (If needed) | For major revision or re-review |
| 9 | Round 2 reviewer comments | Reviewer 1 & Reviewer 2 |
| 10 | Round 2 editor decision | Reject / Minor Rev / Accept |
| 11 | Author revision round 2 (If any) | Author uploads final revision |
| 12 | Article accepted | Final acceptance |
| 13 | Copy editing | Language, punctuation, style guide improvements |
| 14 | Author proofreading | Author checks final version before layout |
| 15 | Final editing | Editing based on proofreading |
| 16 | Layout editing | Page, font, and image formatting |
| 17 | Final layout | Layout ready for print/online |
| 18 | Metadata update | DOI, indexing, category, keywords |
| 19 | Publish | Published online/print |

